If markets can get through January bumps, it looks like positive 2026: Wharton's Siegel
2025-12-29_13-58 • 4m 56s
Joe Kernen (Co-anchor of Squawk Box)
00:00.040
Anthony,
it's
now
Jeremy
Siegel,
Professor
Emeritus
of
Finance
at
the
University
of
Pennsylvania's
Wharton
School
of
Business
and
Chief
Economist
at
Wisdom
Tree.
And
once
again,
it's
good
to
see
you
happy
New
Year.
Happy
holidays,
Jeremy.
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
00:16.200
Thank
you,
Joe.
Been
a
good
time
to
be
pro
uh
US
economy
for
the
past
year.
Once
again,
first
Yeah.
stock
market
with
the
best
economy
in
the
world
I
mean,
third
and
fourth
GDP
numbers,
I
mean,
we
don't
We're
just
getting
the
the
fourth
the
St.
Louis
Fed
came
out
with
a
3%
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
00:34.560
estimate
two
days
before
Christmas.
Of
course,
we
had
that
plus
4%
for
the
third
quarter.
And
even
with
a
negative
first
quarter,
that
would
make
2025
faster
growth
than
the
last
year
of
the
Biden
administration,
even
with
all
the
chaos
with
the
tariffs.
Joe Kernen (Co-anchor of Squawk Box)
00:53.040
These
uh
that
is
the
economic
backdrop
obviously,
but
I
was
really
referring
to
what
19
18%
18
we
may
hit
7,000
before
the
end
of
the
of
the
year
on
the
S&P.
It's
possible.
I'm
not
saying
we
will.
But
the
third
the
third
or
fourth
really
good
year,
third
at
least.
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
01:12.880
Yeah.
And
next
year,
I
think
I
mean
I
know
it's
been
predicted
for
a
long
time
because
the
streak
of
the
Meg
7
is
is
really
quite
unprecedented.
But
you
know
next
year,
I
think
we
I
think
S&P
which
is
very
weighted
towards
of
course
the
Tech
and
Mag
7.
Might
be
less
than
double
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
01:35.000
digits.
5
to
10
still
good.
Then
that
the
you
know
the
non
Mag
7
could
be
10
to
15
with
a
Mag
7
finally
positive
but
uh
in
the
uh
low
single
digits.
Now
of
course
uh
it's
it's
very
difficult
to
make
one
year
estimates
but
that
Yeah
uh
that
would
be
uh
a
a
turnaround
certainly
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
01:56.840
from
the
last
3
years
but
still
leading
to
a
very
good
market
in
2026.
So,
it's
I
think
a
lot
of
of
good
headwinds
I
mean
good
tailwinds
pushing
forward.
We
have
bumps.
We
have
three
bumps
in
January.
We
have
of
course
another
potential
government
shutdown.
We
have
the
Supreme
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
02:18.480
Court
perhaps
going
to
announce
on
what
it's
decided
on
tariffs
and
we
have
perhaps
finally
the
announcement
from
Donald
Trump
about
who
our
next
Fed
chairman
is
going
to
be.
These
are
very
important
issues
to
get
through
you
know
in
addition
to
what
is
GDP
and
what
are
earnings
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
02:37.800
and
what
are
margins
and
we
might
all
get
those
in
January.
So
it
might
certainly
one
of
them
the
shutdown
has
to
be
either
solved
or
extended
in
that
month
and
the
other
two
look
like
they're
likely
to
be
announced.
So
we
need
to
get
through
some
some
bumps
as
I
say
but
if
we
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
02:57.920
can
get
through
those
successfully
Uh,
it
still
looks
like
a
positive
year
for
me.
Right.
Joe Kernen (Co-anchor of Squawk Box)
03:03.600
The
A
lot
of
times
the
default
uh
forecast
at
beginning
of
the
year
is
that
78%
long-term
average
for
for
the
S&P.
We
hear
that
a
lot
and
usually
it
either
does
a
lot
more
or
or
maybe
even
a
down
year.
Very
I
don't
know
if
people
ever
forecast
a
negative
year.
I
don't
I
don't
Joe Kernen (Co-anchor of Squawk Box)
03:22.480
can't
remember
the
last
time
someone
did
that
Well,
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
03:24.640
a
few
do.
I
mean,
you
know,
when
when
you
take
a
real
out-of-consensus
forecast,
you're
either
uh
you
know,
wrong
or
you
become
a
hero
and
you
could
decide
Exactly.
Hey,
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
shoot
for
the
stars
here.
So
so
we
we
do
some
have
a
few
times
when
people
do
take
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
03:39.600
those
out
of
consensus
Gary
forecasts.
Joe Kernen (Co-anchor of Squawk Box)
03:43.680
We
We've
had
some
people
on
say,
"All
right,
multiple
stay
where
they
are."
So
we're
just
going
to
purely
do
the
S&P
advance
based
on
uh
earnings
per
share
growth
for
the
next
12
months.
What
what
do
you
think
we
can
do
there?
Double
digits?
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
03:59.280
You
uh
Uh,
I
think
in
that
case,
you
know,
could
we
get
8
to
10%
you
know,
certainly
um
with
the
Mag
7
slowing
down
as
we
see
every
year
it's
slower
but
still
in
in
in
the
high
teens
or
low
20s
uh
but
we
see
you
know
we
see
PE
compression
because
they're
over
30.
I
mean
let's
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
04:25.040
take
Tesla's
side
which
is
like
200
um
Yeah
the
others
are
uh
You
know,
I,
you
know,
30
for
companies
that
are
growing
20%
a
year
even
with
a
decelerating
growth
is
not
what
I
call
a
bubble.
So,
I'm
not
going
to
predict
that,
you
know,
it's
going
to
last
forever.
I'm
not
going
Jeremy Siegel (Professor Emeritus of Finance)
04:42.400
to
predict
there
won't
be
disappointments
of
Mag
7,
but
I've
been
saying
all
along
that
those
have
been
calling
this
a
bubble
or
saying
this
is,
you
know,
2000
have
have
not
really
been
looking
at
the
the
facts
behind
the
figures.
Autoscroll