Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research - part 14/17
2025-11-25_17-29 • 1h 36m 3s
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
00:00.100
indeed
promising
or
not.
It's
really
that
simple.
It's
an
attempt.
I
think
that
if
the
ideas
turn
out
to
be
correct,
these
ideas
that
we
discussed
around
understanding
generalization.
Hm.
If
these
ideas
turn
out
to
be
correct,
then
I
think
we
will
have
something
worth
it.
Will
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
00:20.540
it
turn
out
to
be
correct?
We
are
doing
research.
We
are
squarely
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
00:24.540
age
of
research
company.
We're
making
progress.
We've
actually
made
quite
good
progress
over
the
past
year,
but
we
need
to
keep
making
more
progress.
Yeah.
More
research.
And
that's
how
I
see
it.
I
see
it
as
an
attempt
to
be
an
attempt
to
be
a
voice
and
a
participant.
Um,
people
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
00:44.700
have
asked
uh
your
co-founder
and
previous
CEO
left
to
go
to
Meta
recently.
And
people
have
asked,
"Well,
if
If
there
was
a
lot
of
breakthroughs
being
made,
that
seems
like
I
think
that
should
have
been
unlikely.
I
wonder
how
you
respond.
Yeah,
so
I
in
for
for
this,
I
will
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
01:02.820
simply
remind
a
few
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
01:04.220
facts
that
may
have
been
forgotten.
And
I
think
this
these
facts
which
provide
the
context,
I
think
they
explain
the
situation.
So
the
context
was
that
we
were
fundraising
at
a
32
billion
valuation
and
then
Meta
um
came
in
and
offered
to
to
acquire
us.
And
I
said
no,
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
01:27.660
but
my
former
co-founder,
like
in
some
sense,
said
yes.
And
as
a
result,
he
also
was
able
to
enjoy
from
a
lot
of
near
term
liquidity.
And
he
was
the
only
person
from
SSI
to
join
Meta.
It
sounds
like
SSI's
plan
is
to
be
a
company
that
is
at
the
frontier
when
you
get
to
this
very
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
01:48.420
important
period
in
human
history
where
you
have
superhuman
intelligence
and
you
have
these
ideas
about
how
to
make
superhuman
intelligence
go
well.
But
other
companies
will
be
trying
their
own
ideas.
What
distinguishes
SSI's
approach
to
making
super
intelligence
go
well?
The
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
02:05.540
main
thing
that
distinguishes
SSI
is
its
technical
approach.
So
we
have
a
different
technical
approach
that
I
think
is
worthy.
And
we
are
pursuing
it.
I
maintain
that
in
the
end
there
will
be
a
convergence
of
strategies.
So
I
think
there
will
be
a
convergence
of
of
strategies
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
02:25.220
where
at
some
point
as
AI
becomes
more
powerful,
it's
going
to
become
more
or
less
clearer
to
everyone
what
the
strategy
should
be.
And
it
should
be
something
like,
yeah,
you
need
to
find
some
way
to
talk
to
each
other
and
you
want
your
first
actual
like
real
super
intelligent
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
02:45.820
AI
to
be
aligned
and
somehow
be,
you
know,
care
for
sentient
life
careful
people,
democratic,
one
of
those,
some
combination
of
their
own.
And
I
think
this
is
the
condition
that
everyone
should
strive
for.
And
that's
what
the
SSI
is
striving
for.
And
I
think
that
this
time,
if
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
03:13.100
not
already,
all
the
other
companies
will
realize
that
they're
striving
towards
the
same
thing.
And
we'll
see,
I
think
that
the
world
will
truly
change
as
I
become
more
powerful.
And
I
think
a
lot
of
these
forecasts
will
like
I
think
things
will
be
really
different
and
people
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
03:27.300
will
be
acting
really
differently.
What
as
speaking
of
forecast,
what
are
your
forecast
to
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
03:32.300
this
system
you're
describing
which
can
learn
as
well
as
a
human
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
03:36.340
and
subsequently
as
a
result
becomes
superhuman?
I
think
like
5
to
20.
5
to
20
years?
So
I
just
want
to
unroll
your
how
you
might
see
the
world
coming.
It's
like
we
have
a
couple
more
years
where
these
other
companies
are
continuing
the
current
approach
and
it's
stalls
out.
And
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
03:56.980
stalls
out
here
meaning
they
earn
no
more
than
low
hundreds
of
billions
in
revenue
or
how
do
you
think
about
what
stalling
out
means?
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
04:03.860
Yeah.
I
think
the
I
think
it
could
I
think
it
could
stall
out
and
I
think
stalling
out
will
look
like
it
will
all
look
very
similar.
Yeah.
Among
all
the
different
companies,
something
like
this.
I'm
not
sure
because
I
think
I
think
I
think
even
with
I
think
even
I
think
even
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
04:22.580
with
stalling
out
I
think
these
companies
could
make
us
stupendous
stupendous
revenue.
Maybe
not
profits
because
they
will
be
it
will
be
they
will
need
to
work
hard
to
differentiate
each
other
from
themselves.
But
revenue
definitely.
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
04:35.220
But
there's
something
your
model
implies
that
the
when
when
the
correct
solution
does
emerge,
there
will
be
convergence
between
all
the
companies.
And
I'm
curious
why
you
think
that's
the
case.
Well,
I
was
talking
more
about
convergence
on
their
largest
strategies.
I
think
Ilya Sutskever (Co-founder and Chief Scientist)
04:50.560
eventual
convergence
on
the
technical
approach
is
probably
going
to
happen
as
well.
But
I
in
I
was
alluding
to
convergence
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
04:56.440
to
the
largest
strategies.
What
what
what
exactly
is
the
thing
that
should
be
done?
I
I
just
want
to
be
a
bit
better
understand
how
you
see
the
future
enrollment.
So,
currently
we
have
these
different
companies
and
you
expect
their
approach
to
continue
generate
earning
revenue,
Dwarkesh Patel (Host)
05:08.120
but
not
get
to
this
human-like
learner.
Yes.
So
now
we
have
these
different
forks
of
companies.
We
have
view,
we
have
thinking
machines,
there's
a
bunch
of
other
labs.
Yes.
And
maybe
one
of
them
figures